Messages in this thread |  | | | From | Robin Getz <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv | | Date | Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:38:23 -0400 |
| |
On Fri 27 Jul 2007 06:18, Yoann Padioleau pondered: > David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> writes: > > > Yoann Padioleau <padator@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > > >> When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to > 0. > > > > Can you make them of style: > > > > if (!x) > > Yes I can. I can make another semantic patch later to do that > transformation. But some people may prefer (x == NULL) to (!x) > so I don't know. I think that transformation > some 0 to NULL is less controversial. > > > > > > instead?
If there is a definite style or semantic preference that everyone should live with - does it make sense to put checks in checkpatch.pl to enforce it?
-Robin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |