[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
    On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 13:45 -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
    > On Friday 27 July 2007 06:25:18 Mike Galbraith wrote:
    > > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 03:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

    > > > So hrm. Are we sure that updatedb is the problem? There are quite a few
    > > > heavyweight things which happen in the wee small hours.
    > >
    > > The balance in _my_ world seems just fine. I don't let any of those
    > > system maintenance things run while I'm using the system, and it doesn't
    > > bother me if my working set has to be reconstructed after heavy-weight
    > > maintenance things are allowed to run. I'm not seeing anything I
    > > wouldn't expect to see when running a job the size of updatedb.
    > >
    > > -Mike
    > Do you realize you've totally missed the point?

    Did you notice that I didn't make one disparaging remark about the patch
    or the concept behind it? Did you notice that I took _my time_ to
    test, to actually look at the problem? No, you're too busy running
    your mouth to appreciate the efforts of others.

    <snips load of useless spleen venting>

    Do yourself a favor, go dig into the VM source. Read it, understand it
    (not terribly easy), _then_ come back and preach to me.

    Have a nice day.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-28 00:13    [W:0.019 / U:8.724 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site