lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)


On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Hmm, perhaps we should introduce a CONFIG_SUSPEND and change
> CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND into CONFIG_HIBERNATION, both depending on
> CONFIG_PM?
>
> There's quite some code needed only for suspend compiled in when CONFIG_PM is
> set ...

Sounds like a good idea, although I suspect that CONFIG_PM really *is*
fairly close to CONFIG_SUSPEND. The thing is, all the stuff it enabled is
largely useless without at least STR.

(Yes, I realize that you can do per-driver suspend events etc, but I
suspect not a lot of people have used it).

But from a logical standpoint, it does make sense to have a separate
config option for the STR support.

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-26 22:01    [W:0.164 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site