[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] MPC8349E-mITX: use platform IDE driver for CF interface
Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> Scott Wood wrote:
>>> Also, what mmio-ide in the compat properly means in the context of
>>> ide_platform which is able to handle both port and memory mapped IDE.
>> I/O-space is only valid in the context of PCI, ISA, or similar buses, and
>> the bus-specific reg format indicates whether it's mmio-space or
>> io-space.
> You could save time on lecturing me (and use it to look on the driver
> ;-).

Sorry, I misread the question as being a mismatch between the
capabilities of the device binding and the driver, not about the
specific compatible name. Something like "generic-ide" would probably
be better.

>> What is board specific about a set of standard IDE registers at a given
> The regisrer mapping used is highly non-standard.

The gap between registers is nonstandard, but that's a fairly common
type of noncompliance in embedded-land, and probably merits being
supported in a generic way. I wouldn't call it "highly" nonstandard.

Is there some other non-standardness that I'm missing?

> We're already in board specific code, so why the heck not? :-)
>> various ns16550-compatibles out there as well?
> I never suggested that -- what I did suggest was make of_serial.c
> recognize certain chip types and register them with 8250 driver.

What would be the advantage of maintaining a list of chips whose only
difference is register spacing, rather than just using reg-shift and
being done with it?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-25 20:43    [W:0.077 / U:3.400 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site