[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: howto get a patch merged (WAS: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)

* Kacper Wysocki <> wrote:

> [snip howto get a patch merged]

> > But a "here is a solution, take it or leave it" approach, before
> > having communicated the problem to the maintainer and before having
> > debugged the problem is the wrong way around. It might still work
> > out fine if the solution is correct (especially if the patch is
> > small and obvious), but if there are any non-trivial tradeoffs
> > involved, or if nontrivial amount of code is involved, you might see
> > your patch at the end of a really long (and constantly growing)
> > waiting list of patches.
> Is that what happened with swap prefetch these two years? The approach
> has been wrong?

i dont know - but one of the maintainers of the code (Nick) says that he
asked for but did not get debug feedback:

> > > And yet despite my repeated pleas, none of those people has yet
> > > spent a bit of time with me to help analyse what is happening.

Con, the maintainer of -ck, certainly has (or had, when he maintained
it) enough clout to coordinate such an effort between non-developer -ck
users and the MM maintainers. Maybe he attempted to do that and has
tried to provide debug feedback to MM maintainers?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-25 18:11    [W:0.051 / U:1.336 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site