[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <> wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I think I'll duck this for now. Otherwise I have a suspicion that I'll
> > be the first person to run it and I'm too old for such excitement.
> I always had the suspicion that you have some magical script
> which will immediately tell you that a patch is not working ;-)

sort of a defensive crouch.

> Works fine on x86_64 (on top of the ctor cleanup patchset) and passes the
> kernel build test but then there may be creatively designed drivers and
> such that pass these flags to the slab allocators which will now BUG.

__GFP_COLD looks OK.

__GFP_COMP I'm not so sure about.
drivers/char/drm/drm_pci.c:drm_pci_alloc() (and other places like infiniband)
pass it into dma_alloc_coherent() which some architectures implement via slab. umm,
arch/arm/mm/consistent.c is one such.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-25 01:15    [W:0.398 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site