![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Paul Mundt wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 06:39:08PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: >> Paul Mundt wrote: >>> It's known that empty objects require explicit tuning for the ABI, >>> however, this has never been anything that was fatal. If you flip >>> something on within each of those subsystems, does the error go away? >> Yes, thanks this fixes it. Would you accept a patch to modify the >> defconfig so that it builds by default? Would be most useful for >> my pet project (http://l4x.org/k/). A fixed toolchain would of course >> also be nice. >> > I'll certainly apply patches that help getting it building, so feel free > to send updates for that. As I also noted, the empty object thing is > non-fatal with my toolchain, so I'd also appreciate it if you could put > a tarball of yours up somewhere so this is a bit easier to verify. I > suspect this is just something we're going to have to change in binutils, > however. You can find it here: http://l4x.org/~jdittmer/sh64-linux-binutils-2.17-gcc-4.1.3pre.tar.bz2 binutils 2.17.50.0.17 (from ftp.kernel.org) gcc 4.1.3 prerelease (svn, fixes a build bug for sh64) Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-07-23 06:43 [W:0.207 / U:0.650 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||