Messages in this thread | | | From | Oliver Neukum <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] Re: Hibernation considerations | Date | Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:31:29 +0200 |
| |
Am Montag 23 Juli 2007 schrieb Miklos Szeredi: > > The reason is that we want them to "park" in safe places, ie. where there > > are no locks held etc. Thus, these safe places need to be chosen somehow > > and since they are not marked throughout the code, we choose the obvious > > one. :-) > > Why shouldn't locks be held? > > No locks which are required for suspend must be held, sure. But > otherwise holding locks doesn't matter at all.
If you can provide a way to tell them apart, this would work.
Regards Oliver
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |