[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: Create clflush() inline, remove hardcoded wbinvd
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 11:05:24AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> The main reason is that everyone seems to invoke it either incorrectly
> > Where is it incorrect?
> Using "r" or "m" (as opposed as "+m") gives gcc the wrong dependency
> information, and it could, at least in theory, cause memory references
> to be moved around it -- especially when using "r".

That doesn't sound correct. Taking the address should be like an escaping
pointer and equivalent to read/write and effectively disable optimizations
on this memory.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-22 21:59    [W:0.051 / U:3.420 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site