[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Hibernation considerations

> >Part of the problem here is that ACPI already has its own terminology,
> >and you're trying to invent a new one instead of using the existing
> >one.
> >
> >I agree, it would be good to have a non-ACPI-specific hibernation mode,
> >something which would look to ACPI like a normal shutdown. But I'm not
> >so sure this is possible.
> why would it not be possible?
> >You have to understand that the ACPI spec is weird and complex. The
> >mere fact that you have written a system image to disk changes the way
> >ACPI regards the shutdown procedure. Even though you may treat all the
> >devices and the rest of the hardware exactly the same, it's a different
> >operation as far as ACPI is concerned, with different requirements.
> >
> >Yes, it's bizarre. Why do you think so many people have complained so
> >vehemently about ACPI for all these years?
> so let's act as if ACPI doesn't exist and make a suspend-to-disk that
> works without it and looks to ACPI like a complete power off/on cycle (but
> looks to the user like a suspend/resume cycle)

...if you act as if ACPI does not exist, you'll loose AC/battery power
status upon resume, and maybe more, because ACPI handles that.
(cesky, pictures)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-21 12:21    [W:0.205 / U:1.248 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site