[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:38:39 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <> wrote:
>> I agree with Andi... it's quite nice to be able to leave some arch/i386
>> stuff, and not carry it over to arch/x86-64.
> Its easy enough to push that stuff into arch/x86/legacy and have one
> subdirectory of stuff to pull in for ancient systems.

The other thing is that "legacy" in this context is fungible. No IOMMU
was legacy until the Intel x86-64 chips came out, and I can promise you
that some legacy code will be necessary once we start seeing VIA and
others come out with embedded x86-64.

On the other hand, it's pretty bloody safe to assume that we'll never
see an x86-64 chip without CPUID, CMOV, FXSAVE, SSE-2, CMPXCHG, etc.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-21 02:13    [W:0.058 / U:0.976 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site