lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC] what should 'uptime' be on suspend?
    Date
    On Friday, 20 July 2007 19:57, Ken Moffat wrote:
    > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:42:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
    > >
    > > man uptime:
    > > uptime - tell how long the system has been running
    > >
    > > I claim that the system is not running when it is suspended,
    > > so the suspension time should not be included in uptime.
    > >
    > So, maybe I shouldn't have put corrected in inverted commas,
    > because this was a real correction and my previous usage was an
    > unintended side-effect of an error.
    >
    > Anyway, the current behaviour is known and I guess any attempt to
    > change it (e.g. to what Bill was expecting) won't be well received.

    I agree.

    Greetings,
    Rafael


    --
    "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-20 23:45    [W:0.053 / U:59.516 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site