Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] what should 'uptime' be on suspend? | Date | Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:49:53 +0200 |
| |
On Friday, 20 July 2007 19:57, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:42:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > man uptime: > > uptime - tell how long the system has been running > > > > I claim that the system is not running when it is suspended, > > so the suspension time should not be included in uptime. > > > So, maybe I shouldn't have put corrected in inverted commas, > because this was a real correction and my previous usage was an > unintended side-effect of an error. > > Anyway, the current behaviour is known and I guess any attempt to > change it (e.g. to what Bill was expecting) won't be well received.
I agree.
Greetings, Rafael
-- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |