[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [i386] Questions regarding provisional page tables initialization
    Hi Andreas,

    On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:18:08AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
    > "Ahmed S. Darwish" <> writes:
    > > yes, but isn't the displacement here (0x007) a _bytes_ displacement ?. so
    > > effectively, %ecx now contains physical address of pg0 + 7bytes. Is it A
    > > meaningful place/address ?.
    > It's not pg0 + 7bytes, it is pg0 plus 3 flag bits. Since a page address
    > is always page aligned, the low bits are reused for flags.

    I'm sure there's a problem in _my_ understanding, but isn't the displacement
    - as specified by AT&T syntax - represented in bytes ?. I've wrote a small
    assembly function to be sure:

    .string "%d\n"

    push %ebp
    mov %esp, %ebp
    push 0x008(%ebp) ## 8 bytes displacement (the first arg), right ?
    push $integer
    call printf
    mov %ebp, %esp
    pop %ebp

    The above method works fine and prints "5" to stdout by the code:

    .global main
    mov $5, %eax
    push %eax
    call test_func

    movl $1, %eax
    movl $0, %ebx
    int $0x80

    now back to head.S code:
    leal 0x007(%edi),%ecx /* Create PDE entry */

    Isn't the above line the same condition (bytes, not bits displacement) ?.
    Thanks for your patience !.

    (For other kind replies, don't understand me wrong. I did my homework and
    studied the pte format before asking ;). It's just the bytes/bits issue
    above that confuses me).

    Ahmed S. Darwish
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-02 12:25    [W:0.022 / U:0.980 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site