[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [i386] Questions regarding provisional page tables initialization
Hi Andreas,

On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:18:08AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Ahmed S. Darwish" <> writes:
> > yes, but isn't the displacement here (0x007) a _bytes_ displacement ?. so
> > effectively, %ecx now contains physical address of pg0 + 7bytes. Is it A
> > meaningful place/address ?.
> It's not pg0 + 7bytes, it is pg0 plus 3 flag bits. Since a page address
> is always page aligned, the low bits are reused for flags.

I'm sure there's a problem in _my_ understanding, but isn't the displacement
- as specified by AT&T syntax - represented in bytes ?. I've wrote a small
assembly function to be sure:

.string "%d\n"

push %ebp
mov %esp, %ebp
push 0x008(%ebp) ## 8 bytes displacement (the first arg), right ?
push $integer
call printf
mov %ebp, %esp
pop %ebp

The above method works fine and prints "5" to stdout by the code:

.global main
mov $5, %eax
push %eax
call test_func

movl $1, %eax
movl $0, %ebx
int $0x80

now back to head.S code:
leal 0x007(%edi),%ecx /* Create PDE entry */

Isn't the above line the same condition (bytes, not bits displacement) ?.
Thanks for your patience !.

(For other kind replies, don't understand me wrong. I did my homework and
studied the pte format before asking ;). It's just the bytes/bits issue
above that confuses me).

Ahmed S. Darwish
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-02 12:25    [W:0.038 / U:6.312 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site