[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    On 7/19/07, Alan Cox <> wrote:
    > > Please distinguish between "cater to" and "support". If the kernel
    > > didn't worry about supporting out-of-tree code, then why would there
    > > be loadable module at all?
    > Memory usage, flexibility, debugging.
    > Module support was not added for external modules.

    Code that is being debugged is, often [usually, I hope], out-of-tree
    code, though it may be aimed at future inclusion.

    However, I do agree that there is value to having loadable modules for
    in-tree functionality, too.

    scott preece
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-19 15:33    [W:0.019 / U:29.656 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site