[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:

    > > It's already pretty clear.
    > I doubt anyone not on lkml or linux-security-module has heard of this.
    > So we'll see.
    > (I was, obviously, talking about end-users)

    If distributions are shipping binary modules and other out of tree code to
    their users, then they should bear responsibility for supporting and
    maintaining the infrastructure required for it, and not expect upstream
    maintainers to do it for them.

    Additionally, if they want to expose their users to risks arising from
    broken and unecessary infrastructure, then they should bear the cost and
    responsibility of doing that and not expect others to do so as well.

    I don't see how this is even slightly difficult to understand.

    - James
    James Morris
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-19 15:03    [W:0.029 / U:10.864 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site