![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 7/17/07, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:15:28 -0700 > "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org> wrote: > > Heh :-). No, it's not a question of trust. First and foremost, it's > > that there are still users who say that they can crash a current > > 4k+interrupt stacks kernel, while the 8k without interrupt stacks is > > fine. > > You forgot "most of the time". Yeah, fair enough. > Its statistically less likely, which > merely means its evilly hard to debug Not being able to debug the cases that occur (and the fact that they're rare, as you're pointing out) is as much of a problem as the crashes themselves. 8k + IRQ stacks with a warning when 4k of process stack is exceeded would seem like a reasonable first step to making 4k a palatable default. Ray - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-07-18 08:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||