![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 7/17/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > Ok.. so my problem still remains, how do I get a non-blocking atomic > reference increment/decrement routine, that would prevent my > container from being deleted? css_put() in my new patchset will be non-blocking. > > I don't find cpusets using css_put(). Cpusets never needs to keep a non-process reference on a cpuset object, so the framework handles everything. Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-07-18 08:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||