lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sysfs: kill an extra put in sysfs_create_link() failure path
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Satyam Sharma wrote:
>>>> sysfs_find_dirent() -- to check for -EEXIST -- should be called
>>>> *before* we create the new dentry for the to-be-created symlink
>>>> in the first place. [ It's weird to grab a reference on the target
>>>> for ourselves (and in fact even allocate the new dirent for the
>>>> to-be-created symlink) and /then/ check for erroneous usage,
>>>> and then go about undoing all that we should never have done
>>>> at all. ] So this test could, and should, be made earlier, IMHO.
>>> Locking.
>> Well s/sysfs_find_dirent/sysfs_get_dirent/ then. And then simply put
>> down the reference later.
>
> Isn't that the current code?

Oops, somehow thought you were talking about allocating it first.
Gee... what difference does using sysfs_get_dirent() make? Do you think
the following code is correct?

sd = sysfs_get_dirent("some name");
if (sd != NULL)
return -EEXIST;
lock;
add_new_node("some name");
unlock;
sysfs_put_dirent(sd);

--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-18 18:45    [W:0.073 / U:1.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site