lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.
    O> In that case, we might as well just always do the scheduled_delayed_work() 
    > with a zero timeout as per the earlier patch. I'd still like to know who
    > *cares*, though? Why not leave it at 1?

    I don't think it really matters too much on modern systems so long as we
    keep the flush_to_ldisc out of IRQ context. Historically we tried to
    batch the ldisc processing but I doubt any modern box cares too much
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-18 01:31    [W:0.040 / U:2.576 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site