[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, James Simmons wrote:
> Because sometimes you do want the delay. In other parts of the tty
> code we do delay.

Ahh, ok, in that it's ok by me.

> What should be done is
> if (tty->low_latency)
> flush_to_ldisc(&tty->;
> else
> schedule_delayed_work(&tty->, 1);
> Is this acceptable to you?

In that case, we might as well just always do the scheduled_delayed_work()
with a zero timeout as per the earlier patch. I'd still like to know who
*cares*, though? Why not leave it at 1?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-17 22:51    [W:0.101 / U:6.152 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site