[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.

    On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, James Simmons wrote:
    > Because sometimes you do want the delay. In other parts of the tty
    > code we do delay.

    Ahh, ok, in that it's ok by me.

    > What should be done is
    > if (tty->low_latency)
    > flush_to_ldisc(&tty->;
    > else
    > schedule_delayed_work(&tty->, 1);
    > Is this acceptable to you?

    In that case, we might as well just always do the scheduled_delayed_work()
    with a zero timeout as per the earlier patch. I'd still like to know who
    *cares*, though? Why not leave it at 1?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-17 22:51    [W:0.022 / U:0.592 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site