lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.

> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Paul Fulghum wrote:
> >
> > The scheduling is to move the processing out of interrupt context.
> > The receive data is often extracted from the hardware
> > at interrupt time and then queued for processing.
>
> You misunderstand.
>
> If the "delay" is zero, then why are you using "delayed" workqueues at
> all?
>
> A delay of zero tends to be pointless. It's not a delay at all, and you
> could just use the regular NON-DELAYING workqueues.

Because sometimes you do want the delay. In other parts of the tty
code we do delay. What should be done is

if (tty->low_latency)
flush_to_ldisc(&tty->buf.work.work);
else
schedule_delayed_work(&tty->buf.work, 1);
Is this acceptable to you?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-17 21:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans