![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > Hi,> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:> > > and note that even on the old scheduler, nice-0 was "3200% more > > powerful" than nice +19 (with CONFIG_HZ=300),> > How did you get that value? At any HZ the ratio should be around 1:10 > (+- rounding error). you are wrong again. I sent you the numbers earlier today already: | PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND | 2332 mingo 25 0 1580 248 196 R 95.1 0.0 0:11.84 loop | 2335 mingo 39 19 1576 244 196 R 3.1 0.0 0:00.39 loop 3.1% is 3067% more than 95.1%, and the ratio is 1:30.67. You again deny above that this is the case, and there's nothing i can do about your denial of facts - that is your own private problem. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-07-17 00:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||