![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 7/16/07, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > Actually SLOB potentially has some fundamental CPU cache hotness > advantages over the other allocators, for the same reasons as > its space advantages. Because consecutive allocations hit the same cache-hot page regardless of requested size where as SLUB by definition distributes allocations to different pages (some of which may not be hot)? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-07-16 09:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||