lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH/RFC] msleep() with hrtimers
    Hi,

    On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Jonathan Corbet wrote:

    > The OLPC folks and I recently discovered something interesting: on a
    > HZ=100 system, a call to msleep(1) will delay for about 20ms. The
    > combination of jiffies timekeeping and rounding up means that the
    > minimum delay from msleep will be two jiffies, never less. That led to
    > multi-second delays in a driver which does a bunch of short msleep()
    > calls and, in response, a change to mdelay(), which will come back in
    > something closer to the requested time.
    >
    > Here's another approach: a reimplementation of msleep() and
    > msleep_interruptible() using hrtimers. On a system without real
    > hrtimers this code will at least drop down to single-jiffy delays much
    > of the time (though not deterministically so). On my x86_64 system with
    > Thomas's hrtimer/dyntick patch applied, msleep(1) gives almost exactly
    > what was asked for.

    BTW there is another thing to consider. If you already run with hrtimer/
    dyntick, there is not much reason to keep HZ at 100, so you could just
    increase HZ to get the same effect.

    bye, Roman
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-16 16:15    [W:0.019 / U:0.764 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site