Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:16:31 +0200 | From | "Kay Sievers" <> | Subject | Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink |
| |
On 7/13/07, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 04:31:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org) wrote: > > > > Need a dependency on NET there? > > > > > > It's really sad to make DM dependent on the network layer. > > > > > > > Yes, it would be somewhat sad. However one can presumably continue to use > > DM, just without "DM netlink events". > > On my machine device mapper (lvm, raid) does not work without sockets, > (maybe not dm, but hotplug, which creates nodes, or configuration) > so it already depends on it. Hotplug depends on networking. > > You missed the day when everyone started to depend on networking :)
Right, uevents (udev) depend on networking. One could still use the /sbin/hotplug fork-bomb, but boxes that don't want networking are often that small, that the amount of events the kernel creates today, leads immediately to OOM, because of too many event processes forked at the same time.
Kay - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |