Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:50:40 +0800 | From | TripleX Chung <> | Subject | Ask for help, about the trivial patches. |
| |
I am working on the chinese translated version of Documentation/SubmittingPatches and get some problem about the "Trivial patches".I can not understand what "Trivial patches" exactly means.The documentation said:
Trivial patches must qualify for one of the following rules:
Spelling fixes in documentation //Understand
Spelling fixes which could break grep(1) //Is there any wrong spelling won't break grep(1)?
Warning fixes (cluttering with useless warnings is bad) //Understand
Compilation fixes (only if they are actually correct) //Understand
Runtime fixes (only if they actually fix things) //What kind of runtime fixes? Could anyone give some examples?
Removing use of deprecated functions/macros (eg. check_region) //Understand
Contact detail and documentation fixes //Means Contact detail fixes and documentation fixes, right? Are all the documentation fixes "trivial"?
Non-portable code replaced by portable code (even in arch-specific, since people copy, as long as it's trivial) //Do not understand the words in the brackets.
Any fix by the author/maintainer of the file (ie. patch monkey in re-transmission mode) //It means if I am the author of a file, when I modify the file, the patch is trivial, right?
Please give me some advice. Thanks in advance.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |