Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:29:25 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: -mm merge plans -- anti-fragmentation |
| |
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:20:43 +0100 mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman) wrote:
> > create-the-zone_movable-zone.patch > > allow-huge-page-allocations-to-use-gfp_high_movable.patch > > handle-kernelcore=-generic.patch > > > > Mel's moveable-zone work. In a similar situation. We need to stop whatever > > we're doing and get down and work out what we're going to do with all this > > stuff. > > > > Whatever about grouping pages by mobility, I would like to see these go > through. They have a real application for hugetlb pool resizing where the > administrator knows the range of hugepages that will be required but doesn't > want to waste memory when the required number of hugepages is small. I've > cc'd Kenneth Chen as I believe he has run into this problem recently where > I believe partitioning memory would have helped. He'll either confirm or deny.
Still no decision here, really.
Should we at least go for
add-__gfp_movable-for-callers-to-flag-allocations-from-high-memory-that-may-be-migrated.patch create-the-zone_movable-zone.patch allow-huge-page-allocations-to-use-gfp_high_movable.patch handle-kernelcore=-generic.patch
in 2.6.23? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |