[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] Kexec jump: The first step to kexec base hibernation
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Mark Lord wrote:

> wrote:
>> actually, I think that while you may be able to get away with only one
>> kernel, you are probably better off with two. on the hibernate kernel you
>> can choose many 'embedded' options that don't make sense for the normal
>> kernel (no high mem, no SMP support, no SELinux, no network routing, not
>> netfilter, use SLOB not SLAB/SLUB, etc). also keep in mind that each
>> module that you load wastes apartial page of memory.
> No highmem? No thanks.
> I really want hibernate to save stuff from above 1GB as well
> as the stuff below 1GB.

oops, good point. I was thinking that the hibernate kernel wouldn't need
that much ram for it's own operation and forgetting that it needed to
access everything the main system had.

David Lang
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-12 21:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean