[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFC: CONFIG_PAGE_SHIFT (aka software PAGE_SIZE)
    On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 18:31 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:44:49AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
    > > That's crap. Just because a machine has lots of memory does not
    > > make it OK to waste lots of memory.
    > It's not just wasted, it lowers overhead all over the place. Yes, the
    > benefit of wasting less pagecache may largely outweight the benefit of
    > having a larger page size, but if you've a lot of memory perhaps your
    > working set already fits in the cache, or perhaps you don't fit in the
    > cache regardless of the page size.

    Have you guys seen Shaggy's page cache tails?

    We've had the same memory waste issue on ppc64 with 64k hardware

    -- Dave

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-12 18:39    [W:0.020 / U:10.776 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site