lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 11 Jul 2007 14:54:12 -0700
FromChris Wright <>
SubjectRe: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
* Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu) wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:16:38 +0200, Andi Kleen said:
> (Note - I'm just a usually-confused crash test dummy here...)
> 
> > Well I spent a lot of time making the x86-64 timing code work
> > well on a variety of machines; working around a wide variety
> > of hardware and platform bugs. I obviously don't agree on your description
> > of its maintenance state. 
> 
> I'm seeing a bit of a disconnect here.  If you spent all that time making it
> work, how come the guys who developed the patch are saying you didn't provide
> any feedback about the patchset?

I think Andi's referring to the existing x86_64 code, which gets
replaced by the patchset in question.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-11 23:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2008