Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Date | Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:46:41 +0200 |
| |
Andi,
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 23:16 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > What contribution do we have from you instead? A week before the .23 > > I told him my objections privately earlier. Basically i would > like to see an actually debuggable step-by-step change, not a rip everything > out.
You promised privately to do a thorough review as well, which I'm still waiting for since months.
> If that isn't possible it needs very careful review which just hasn't > happened yet. But I'm not convinced even step by step is not possible > here.
There is no step by step thing. You convert an arch to clock events or you convert it not.
> I thought it was clear that rip everything out is rarely a good idea > in Linux land? That's really not something I should need to harp on > repeatedly.
If you have technical objections, put them on the table. Point by point.
All I heard so far from you are platitudes, which are not worth the electrons to transport them.
tglx
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |