![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Randy, On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 14:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > I certainly haven't. I can barely keep up with reading about 1/2 > of lkml emails. And in my non-scientific method, I think that we > are suffering from both (a) more patch submittals and (b) fewer > qualified reviewers (per kernel KLOC) than we had 3-5 years ago. > > I don't see how you can expect Andrew to review these or any other > specific patchset. Do you have some suggestions on how to clone > Andrew? Ingo was talking to Andi, the x86_64 maintainer, not to Andrew. And I share his opinion that the maintainer of the subsystem, which is affected by such a fundamental patch, could have at least shown any public sign of interest, disgust, comment or what ever in a 3+ month time frame. Especially about a patch, which is a logical consequence of an almost two years public and transparent effort to consolidate the time code in the kernel. I for my part have no problem maintaining the set for another round out of tree and weed out eventually problems in -mm, but my expectation for qualified response of the responsible maintainer is exactly zero right now. Thanks, tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-07-11 23:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||