lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 11 Jul 2007 23:16:38 +0200
FromAndi Kleen <>
SubjectRe: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
Well I spent a lot of time making the x86-64 timing code work
well on a variety of machines; working around a wide variety
of hardware and platform bugs. I obviously don't agree on your description
of its maintenance state. 

> What contribution do we have from you instead? A week before the .23 

I told him my objections privately earlier. Basically i would
like to see an actually debuggable step-by-step change, not a rip everything 
out.

If that isn't possible it needs very careful review which just hasn't
happened yet. But I'm not convinced even step by step is not possible
here.

I thought it was clear that rip everything out is rarely a good idea
in Linux land?  That's really not something I should need to harp on 
repeatedly.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-11 23:19    [from the cache]
©2003-2008