Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:54:49 -0400 | From | Bill Davidsen <> | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled ACPI_PROCFS removal |
| |
Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Jul 9 2007 17:45, Alan Cox wrote: >>> This patch contains the scheduled removal of the ACPI procfs interface. >> What part of "we do not gratuitously break user space interfaces" is so >> hard for people to understand. > > Generally I am with you on that, but if everyone keeps on using /proc -- > and I do[*] -- we will never get rid of it. > Is there some reason why you should get rid of it? Is it causing a lot work to maintain? > > [*] Does someone have an alternative for /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/{state,info}? >
-- Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |