Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:05:14 -0700 | From | "Paul Menage" <> | Subject | Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| |
On 7/10/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > Andrew, how about we merge enough of the container framework to > > support CFS? Bits we could leave out for now include container_clone() > > support and the nsproxy subsystem, fork/exit callback hooks, and > > possibly leave cpusets alone for now (which would also mean we could > > skip the automatic release-agent stuff). I'm in Tokyo for the Linux > > Foundation Japan symposium right now, but I should be able to get the > > new patchset to you for Friday afternoon. > > mm.. Given that you propose leaving bits out for the 2.6.23 merge, and > that changes are still pending and that nothing will _use_ the framework in > 2.6.23
That's what I was originally thinking too, but since CFS has been merged, CFS group scheduling would use it.
Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |