![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:42:16 -0400> Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote: > >> (just to provide my indicator of status) > > Thanks. > >>> libata-add-irq_flags-to-struct-pata_platform_info-fix.patch>> are other pata_platform people happy with this? I don't know embedded >> well enough to know if adding this struct member will break things. > > This is just a silly remove-unneeded-cast-of-void* cleanup. I wrote this > as a fixup against > libata-add-irq_flags-to-struct-pata_platform_info.patch with the intention > of folding it into that base patch, but you went and merged the submitter's > original patch so this trivial fixup got stranded in -mm. Feel free to give > it the piss-off-too-trivial treatment. I'm sorry, I didn't look closely enough. I was referring to the add-irq-flags patch itself, not your small fix. >>> ata-ahci-alpm-store-interrupt-value.patch>>> ata-ahci-alpm-expose-power-management-policy-option-to-users.patch >>> ata-ahci-alpm-enable-link-power-management-for-ata-drivers.patch >>> ata-ahci-alpm-enable-aggressive-link-power-management-for-ahci-controllers.patch >>>>>> These appear to need some work.>> seemed mostly OK to me. what comments did I miss?> > Oh, I thought these were the patches which affected scsi and which James > had issues with. I guess I got confused. hrm. ISTR James wanted some cleanups, Kristen did some cleanups, then looking at the cleanups decided they were needed / appropriate at this time. Anyway, these are in my mbox queue and the libata portions (of which the code is the majority) seem OK. Need to give them a final review. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-07-10 20:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||