| Date | Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:15:58 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch (was: re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| |
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 07:52:51 -0400 Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 01:31:52AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Merge > > > > fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch > > Andrew, > > Could you replace the comment/header section of > fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch with the > following (attached below) ? This is from the ext4 patches, where > Amit had cleaned up description, which will make for a cleaner and > easier to understand submission into the git tree.
There were issues with the x86 patch, the s390 patch was wrong and Tony wants the the ia64 patch to use a different syscall number.
So I dropped everything. Let's start again from scratch. I'd suggest that for now we go with just an i386/x86_64 implementation, let the arch maintainers wire things up when that has settled down. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|