![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread
|
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:07:37 +0200 Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote: > > fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch > > Still broken: arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S wants compat_sys_fallocate instead > of sys_fallocate. Also compat_sys_fallocate probably should be moved to > fs/compat.c. > > > fallocate-on-s390.patch > > We reserved a different syscall number than the one that is used right now > in the patch. Please drop this patch... Martin or I will wire up the syscall > as soon as the x86 variant is merged. Everything else just causes trouble and > confusion. OK, I dropped all the fallocate patches. That means that a few other syscalls (or at least, revoke) get renumbered. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-07-10 11:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||