![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Al Viro wrote: > > > > Eww... Idea of pipe(2) taking flags as argument... > > Right. That was one of the patches, and it was one that I said was too > damn ugly to live. > > So I instead suggested the alternate approach of adding a single new > system call that runs another system call indirectly, with a set of flags > and/or other behaviour modifications. What if we put a data section in the vdso and we let userspace set the flags or whatever in there? Syslets could use one of those bits to set the "threadlet mode" w/out calling a syscall at all. In that way we have no new syscalls whatsoever. No? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-06-10 03:39 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||