[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Re: Linux v2.6.22-rc3
    On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:02:24PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
    > I don't think the first one is probable considering BSY is supposed to
    > set when SRST is received. This is pretty fundamental in the protocol
    > and necessary for the device to work properly as master, so I think this
    > is one of few things we can rely upon.

    See a URL I posted earlier in this thread. With dumb ATAPI devices we
    actually have to wait a bit for BSY to be asserted. Not only at reset,
    but also for every command.

    > How about limiting nsect/lbal wait duration? Say, 100ms or 500ms? That
    > can somewhat ease our paranoia and should show acceptable behavior for
    > braindead devices too.

    That's quite reasonable.


    P.S. We can probably reduce the msleep(150) sprinkled about the code to
    msleep(100), for the dumb-ATAPI-device wait.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-08 16:35    [W:0.020 / U:34.480 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site