![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 6/7/07, Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I remember this one ... > > On 6/7/07, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:26:10AM -0500, Stuart_Hayes@Dell.com wrote: > > > > > > I wasn't actually able to reproduce the bug myself, but I guess it is > > > pretty obvious that I shouldn't have called cpufreq_unregister_notifier > > > with a spinlock held. I haven't been doing this long enough to know > > > exactly which kernel this patch should be against, so let me know if > > > this ins't good. Thanks! > > > > > > > > > This patch (for the 2.6.21.3 kernel plus previously sent cpufreq > > > notifier patch) fixes a bug caused by calling > > > cpufreq_unregister_notifier (which can sleep) while holding a spinlock. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stuart Hayes <stuart_hayes@dell.com> > > > > Hm, this doesn't apply to the 2.6.21.3 kernel. > > The cpufreq patches only live in -mm as of now ... Argh, excuse the noise! > > Can you send both patches merged together? > > > > And is the fix already in Linus's tree? And you clearly meant gregkh-usb-usb-ehci-cpufreq-fix.patch here ... (btw, no, I don't see this in the latest git) Satyam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2007-06-07 06:45 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||