lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    Subjectwhy is it called "asm-generic/atomic.h"?

    i'm just curious -- why does that particular header file have that
    name? its opening comment reads:

    * Allows to provide arch independent atomic definitions without the need to
    * edit all arch specific atomic.h files.

    but that's *not* what that header file does. rather, it simply
    defines the "long" form of the atomic operations that can be used *in
    addition to* the arch-specific ones.

    wouldn't it make more sense to have called that header file
    something like "asm-generic/atomic_long.h", so as not to mislead folks
    into thinking it represented an *alternative* to those other header
    files?

    rday
    --
    ========================================================================
    Robert P. J. Day
    Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
    Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

    http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
    ========================================================================
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-07 14:33    [W:0.019 / U:33.344 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site