lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 7 Jun 2007 08:43:42 +1000
FromPaul Mackerras <>
SubjectRe: signalfd API issues (was Re: [PATCH/RFC] signal races/bugs, losing TIF_SIGPENDING and other woes)
Jeff Dike writes:

> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:50:04PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Yeah, synchronous signals should probably never be delivered to another
> > process, even via signalfd. There's no point delivering a SEGV to
> > somebody else :-)
> 
> Sure there is.  UML does exactly that - intercepting child signals
> (including SEGV) with wait.

What Ben was talking about was stealing a synchronous SEGV from a task
without stopping it, and as Ben says that makes no sense.
Intercepting a signal and stopping the task is reasonable, and that is
what ptrace does, and I assume also UML.

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-06 22:47    [from the cache]
©2003-2008