lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH ext3/ext4] orphan list corruption due bad inode
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:19:10 +0400 Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru> wrote:

> After ext3 orphan list check has been added into ext3_destroy_inode() (please see my previous patch) the following situation has been detected:
> EXT3-fs warning (device sda6): ext3_unlink: Deleting nonexistent file (37901290), 0
> Inode 00000101a15b7840: orphan list check failed!
> 00000773 6f665f00 74616d72 00000573 65725f00 06737270 66000000 616d726f
> ...
> Call Trace: [<ffffffff80211ea9>] ext3_destroy_inode+0x79/0x90
> [<ffffffff801a2b16>] sys_unlink+0x126/0x1a0
> [<ffffffff80111479>] error_exit+0x0/0x81
> [<ffffffff80110aba>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
>
> First messages said that unlinked inode has i_nlink=0, then ext3_unlink() adds this inode into orphan list.
>
> Second message means that this inode has not been removed from orphan list. Inode dump has showed that i_fop = &bad_file_ops and it can be set in make_bad_inode() only. Then I've found that ext3_read_inode() can call make_bad_inode() without any error/warning messages, for example in the following case:
> ...
> if (inode->i_nlink == 0) {
> if (inode->i_mode == 0 ||
> !(EXT3_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_mount_state & EXT3_ORPHAN_FS)) {
> /* this inode is deleted */
> brelse (bh);
> goto bad_inode;
> ...
>
> Bad inode can live some time, ext3_unlink can add it to orphan list, but
> ext3_delete_inode() do not deleted this inode from orphan list. As
> result we can have orphan list corruption detected in ext3_destroy_inode().
>
> However it is not clear for me how to fix this issue correctly.
>
> As far as i see is_bad_inode() is called after iget() in all places excluding ext3_lookup() and ext3_get_parent(). I believe it makes sense to add bad inode check to these functions too and call iput if bad inode detected.

Please avoid the 500-column paragraphs?

> Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext3/namei.c b/fs/ext3/namei.c
> index 9bb046d..e3ac8c3 100644
> --- a/fs/ext3/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext3/namei.c
> @@ -1019,6 +1019,11 @@ static struct dentry *ext3_lookup(struct inode * dir, struct dentry *dentry, str
>
> if (!inode)
> return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
> +
> + if (is_bad_inode(inode)) {
> + iput(inode);
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> + }
> }
> return d_splice_alias(inode, dentry);
> }
> @@ -1054,6 +1059,11 @@ struct dentry *ext3_get_parent(struct dentry *child)
> if (!inode)
> return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
>
> + if (is_bad_inode(inode)) {
> + iput(inode);
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> + }
> +
> parent = d_alloc_anon(inode);
> if (!parent) {
> iput(inode);

Seems reasonable. So this prevents the bad inodes from getting onto the
orphan list in the first place?

What caused those inodes to be bad, anyway? Memory allocation failures?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-05 04:07    [W:0.047 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site