lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [AppArmor 38/45] AppArmor: Module and LSM hooks
Date
On Monday 04 June 2007 15:12, Pavel Machek wrote:
> How will kernel work with very long paths? I'd suspect some problems,
> if path is 1MB long and I attempt to print it in /proc
> somewhere.

Pathnames are only used for informational purposes in the kernel, except in
AppArmor of course. /proc only uses pathnames in a few places,
but /proc/mounts will silently fail and produce garbage entries. That's not
ideal of course; we should fix that somehow.

Note that this has nothing to do with the AppArmor discussion ...

> Perhaps vfs should be modified not to allow such crazy paths? But placing
> limit in aa is ugly.

Dream on. Redefining fundamental vfs semantics is not an option; we should
rather make sure that we fail gracefully. Considering the alternatives, I
still prefer the configurable limit. That's way more useful than allowing a
process to DOS the kernel with AppArmor.

Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-04 16:33    [W:0.484 / U:0.784 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site