lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: IRQ handling difference between i386 and x86_64
From
Date
On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 16:55 +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that IRQ handling is somehow different between i386 and x86_64.
>
> In my Dell PowerEdge 1950 is it possible to enable interrupts spreading
> over all CPUs. This a single CPU, four CORE system (Quad-Core E5335 Xeon)
> so I think that interrupts migration may be useful. Unfortunately, it
> works only with 32-bit kernel. Booting it with x86_64 leads to situation,
> when all interrupts goes only to the first cpu matching a smp_affinity
> mask.

arguably that is the most efficient behavior... round robin of
interrupts is the worst possible case in terms of performance

are you using irqbalance ? (www.irqbalance.org)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-30 17:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site