[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: IRQ handling difference between i386 and x86_64

On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 16:55 +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>> Hello,
>> It seems that IRQ handling is somehow different between i386 and x86_64.
>> In my Dell PowerEdge 1950 is it possible to enable interrupts spreading
>> over all CPUs. This a single CPU, four CORE system (Quad-Core E5335 Xeon)
>> so I think that interrupts migration may be useful. Unfortunately, it
>> works only with 32-bit kernel. Booting it with x86_64 leads to situation,
>> when all interrupts goes only to the first cpu matching a smp_affinity
>> mask.
> arguably that is the most efficient behavior... round robin of
> interrupts is the worst possible case in terms of performance

Even on dual/quadro core CPUs with shared cache? So why it is possible to
enable such behaviuor in BIOS, which works only on i386 BTW. :(

> are you using irqbalance ? (

Yes, I'm aware about this useful tool, but in some situations (routing
for example) it cannot help much as it keeps three cpus idle. :(

Best regards,

Krzysztof Olędzki
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-01 00:55    [W:0.050 / U:63.432 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site