[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.6.22-rc3 hibernate(?) fails totally - regression
    Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > It would be interesting to see what triggered it, since it apparently
    > worked before. So yes, a bisection would be great.

    Tejun, all the problematic patches are yours - so adding you.
    Neil, since the problem only occurs whilst an xfs filesystem is mounted on a
    raid6 array, I've cc'ed you too...

    Got as far as I could...
    I've run 9 or 10 kernels/bisects and got to a point with 8 of Tejun's changesets
    where it wouldn't compile:

    CC drivers/ata/sata_via.o
    drivers/ata/sata_via.c:120: error: `ata_scsi_device_suspend' undeclared here
    (not in a function)
    drivers/ata/sata_via.c:120: error: initializer element is not constant
    drivers/ata/sata_via.c:120: error: (near initialization for `svia_sht.suspend')
    drivers/ata/sata_via.c:121: error: `ata_scsi_device_resume' undeclared here (not
    in a function)
    drivers/ata/sata_via.c:121: error: initializer element is not constant
    drivers/ata/sata_via.c:121: error: (near initialization for `svia_sht.resume')
    make[2]: *** [drivers/ata/sata_via.o] Error 1

    git bisect visualise gave:

    bad: 48aaae7a2fa46e1ed0d0b7677fde79ccfcb8c963
    bisect: 54936f8b099325992f0f212a5e366fd5257c6c9c
    good: 0a3fd051c7036ef71b58863f8e5da7c3dabd9d3f

    I used:
    git reset --hard 8575b814097af648dad284bd3087875a11b13d18
    git reset --hard e92351bb53c0849fabfa80be53cbf3b0aa166e54
    git reset --hard 3a32a8e96694a243ec7e7feb6d76dfc4b1fe90c1
    git reset --hard 9666f4009c22f6520ac3fb8a19c9e32ab973e828
    to step through - non compiled
    git reset --hard 1d30c33d8d07868199560b24f10ed6280e78a89c
    compiled and hung on resume.

    given the first patch identified is
    9666f4009c22f6520ac3fb8a19c9e32ab973e828: "libata: reimplement suspend/resume
    support using sdev->manage_start_stop"
    That seems a good candidate...

    Incidentally, when I compile 1d30c33d8d07868199560b24f10ed6280e78a89c (far side
    of the implicated changesets) if I umount my xfs over raid6 filesystem (no lvm
    as I said in the OP) the resume succeeds.

    PS I hope I've interpreted bisect correctly - first use and all that...
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-03 17:07    [W:0.023 / U:122.748 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site