![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Michael Kerrisk wrote: > Well, I think all that LFS seems to want is links that are > stable "for a while" (since I don't suppose that they want > to use really old tarballs in any case). So, for > the benefit of LFS, I'll just be less aggressive about > moving tarballs into "Old" (I'll leave them sitting in http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages/ > for a few months at least.) If this helps, here is the version information. Stable LFS (version 6.2, released on August 3, 2006) tells users to download man-pages 2.34 (two releases old at that time). LFS-6.3 is expected to be released in two months or so, thus a one-year period before moving tarballs to "Old" should be enough even for stable LFS books (and if we agree on that, I'll close http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2037 as invalid). Thanks for cooperation. -- Alexander E. Patrakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-06-29 10:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||