[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Userspace compiler support of "long long"
    On Jun 27, 2007, at 23:57:54, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
    > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 06:30:52PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
    >> Then all 64-bit archs have:
    >> typedef signed long __s64;
    >> typedef unsigned long __u64;
    >> While all 32-bit archs have:
    >> typedef signed long long __s64;
    >> typedef unsigned long long __u64;
    > include/asm-parisc/types.h:typedef unsigned long long __u64;
    > For both 32 and 64-bit.
    > include/asm-sh64/types.h:typedef unsigned long long __u64;
    > include/asm-x86_64/types.h:typedef unsigned long long __u64;
    > So that's three architectures that violate your first assertion.

    Oh, ok, that makes it even easier to say this with certainty:
    Changing the other 64-bit archs to use "long long" for their 64-bit
    numbers will not cause additional warnings. I'm also almost certain
    there are no architectures which use "long long" for 128-bit
    integers. (Moreover, I can't find hardly anything which does 128-bit
    integers at all).

    Kyle Moffett

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-28 16:55    [W:0.032 / U:5.596 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site